Fujitsu E310BT headphone have a interesting, sleek design that allow you to transform your headphone to a speaker! Here are some of the few awesome features from this product has offer:
Dual-use headphone and speaker
WIreless, 4.2 bluetooth connection
Rechargeable using micro USB cable
Standby time up to 23 hours!
Call answer function, redial the last call function, end-call function
FM radio
MicroSD card slot, play music without connecting a device
Design and Build Quality
I personally really love the classic black color over. The appearance is minimalist. The earmuffs are very soft and comfortable. However, the framework build quality is premium that you would expect from top brands like Beats.
As you could expect for the low price point, most parts of the construction are made of aluminium, including the casing, the button, etc. The headphone is not heavy so it gives a feeling that it is not strong enough to external shock. But one good thing is that the buttons are very easy to press and locate on even you have put it on already.
Fujitsu dual-use E310BT headphone is also equipped with the ability to listen to music from Micro-SD card, which is rarely found in the market. Basically you can treat the headphone as a standalone music device, without worrying connection lost and battery drain from the smartphones.
Let's try out the awesome featured feature with the twist-out speaker from E310BT headphone. This function is good which I think suitable for outgoing person, you can share your music with friends and family with just a twist!
Conclusion
E310BT has a good value for money. The quality of the stereo bass is out of expectation. This is a budgeted option for you. This headphone is available on Lazada for RM399.
Fujitsu is the leading Japanese information and communication technology (ICT) company offering a full range of technology products, solutions and services which established on June 1935. Approximately 155,000 Fujitsu people support customers in more than 100 countries. Now Fujitsu come out with some awesome headphone series which are E210BT ( which is what I am going to talk about) and E310BT. Let's go!
Fujitsu E210BT Wireless Bluetooth 2 in 1 headphone brings thing to the next level! These headphone were also speakers! As you twist-out both earmuffs, the system automate headphone and transform to a speaker mode. Which I think that's quite interesting and needed when I hang out with some friends, I can share my music with them. For me, headphone is something very private. I don't like to share with others but with this feature, I could share my music without sharing the same earmuff to others.
For the earmuff quality on Fujitsu E210BT Wireless Bluetooth 2 in 1 Headphone, it's made by ultrasoft protein leather, which is very comfortable for long hours wearing. E210BT also having an adjustable headband, it just fit everybody's head size.
Have a look on the features on E210BT!
Dual-use headphone and speaker
WIreless, 4.2 bluetooth connection
Rechargeable using micro USB cable
Standby time up to 23 hours!
Call answer function, redial the last call function, end-call function
FM radio
MicroSD card slot, play music without connecting a device
Rechargeable batteries with MicroUSB cable
As you could expect for the low price point, they did a good job on packaging as well, with the matte surface ( I like matte surface very much!) and some emborss part, so the packaging look sleek and tidy (Well design skill from Japan). The headphone is light weight, easy to carry with foldable headphone design.
Conclusion
E210BT is good value for money. The quality of the music is out of expectation with the speaker mode. This can be your budget plan if you are looking for low-price which come with a good quality headphone + speaker. This headphone is available on Lazada with promotion price for RM249 and the original price would be RM399.
Bose is rounding out its wireless Bluetooth speaker lineup with its smallest and least expensive model yet, the SoundLink Micro, available now for $110, £100 or $AU170.
The fully waterproof speaker weighs in at 10 ounces (290 grams) and measures 3.75 by 3.75 by 1.5 inches (95 by 95 by 38 mm). Bearing in mind its diminutive stature, Bose says it has "unmatched sound for its size." Other features include a "tear-resistant" strap and an integrated microphone for speakerphone calls or to access Siri or Google Assistant.
Here’s an example of a product that’s impossible to grade with a single score: the Audio-Technica DSR9BT headphones. They are unique both technologically and practically, providing the best sound out of any wireless headphone yet, but only in limited circumstances. They outperform every other pair of Bluetooth headphones when listened to in a quiet environment, but they fail miserably when taken out into the din of a busy street.
I’ve been excited about the $549 DSR9BTs since I first heard Bjork’s Homogenic through them at CES in January. The soundstage and stereo separation from these nominally closed-back headphones are exceptional, and Bjork’s voice is recreated with affecting fidelity. Pressing play on these cans is going to wow most listeners, because they just don’t sound like wireless headphones. In all of my testing and experience with headphones, I’ve never heard anything so pure and undistorted without a wire attached.
The DSR9s reproduce treble that rises majestically to match the intensity of vocals yet is still sufficiently refined to not assault the listener’s ears. This is not to be taken as a given with all Audio-Technica headphones, as the popular M50s from this same company have spiky treble that’s best appreciated by people with at least a little bit of hearing loss. But Audio-Technica really nails the sound balance with its wireless DSR9s, which are lifelike, dynamic, and never boring. When Bjork rolls her Rs on “Unravel,” it sounds like a cat purring, and it produces a similar effect of deep satisfaction in me as a listener. It’s not just Bjork, either: 2Pac, Stromae, PJ Harvey, and all other vocalists also sound engaging and real.udio-Technica, like the majority of Japanese headphone companies, tends toward a leaner sound that emphasizes the higher registers and leaves many people feeling undernourished on the bass front. The DSR9s are in danger of entering that territory too — they certainly can’t be accused of giving youtoo muchbass — but they have just enough thump to satisfy. It’s a tricky issue, bass, because the more of it there is, the less high-end detail will be perceptible in the playback of music. Audio-Technica’s chosen tuning works because the realism and tight precision of the DSR9 bass is such that it still delivers the impact of the song or movie being listened to.
The Audio-Technica DSR9s are the first pair of headphones in a long time that I’ve spontaneously danced to. They’re also the first wireless pair that I’ve managed to completely drain the battery of. I got about eight hours at a high volume, which isn’t much by the broader standards of wireless cans. Though if you’re judging by sound quality alone, it’s still eight hours more than any other wireless headphones can achieve at this level of fidelity.
I’m okay with the DSR9s not having the longest battery life for one major reason: I’d never want to take them too far away from home anyway. Every good thing I’ve said about their sound must be couched in the context of me listening to them in a reasonably quiet environment. They’re awesome to have at home, excellent to use when you want to zone out everyone else in the office, but you shouldn’t try to use them while commuting between those two locations. Certainly, if you’re flying with these cans, your best bet will be to just leave them in their nice, semi-rigid protective case.
Using the DSR9s on the London underground, I hear that tenderly balanced sound collapsing under the weight of the train chugging its way through the tunnel. The bass becomes anemic, and the emotive impact is lost. Walking out into the crowds of the central Oxford Street shopping area, I yearn for a quiet spot so I can once again get that superb, emotional DSR9 sound. This is a problem.
Wireless headphones exist for their convenience and mobility. Closed-back headphones have that design to try and isolate external noise from the music playing on the inside. Both impose design limitations on headphone makers, who could create awesome sound much more easily if they go with a wired open-back design (such as, for example, the Sennheiser HD 650s); it’s just much simpler. Audio-Technica’s DSR9s are both wireless and closed, both things aimed at making them suitable for portable use, but they completely fail at that task.
I trust you now understand my quandary. Do I rate these headphones on the undeniable strength of their organic, beautiful, hi-fi sound when listened to indoors, or do I dismiss them on the basis of their unsatisfying performance outdoors?
The details of their practical use also leave me conflicted. On the one hand, the DSR9s are light, well padded, and comfortable for long periods. But the pads do heat up my ears, especially in the summer, which undermines the degree of comfort. The ear cups fold down to a flat shape, but don’t fold in (which competitors like the V-Moda Crossfade 2 Wireless do) for a more compact and portable shape. There’s a physical volume control built into the left cup, just below a touch-sensitive window for play/pause control. The latter is positioned right where your left thumb would land when removing the headphones — a deliberate design touch to allow you to take them off and pause at the same time. That’s great except I also find myself accidentally activating that control when merely adjusting the headphones.
One final peculiarity: because of their unique Pure Digital Drive architecture, the DSR9s don’t accept a conventional analog signal via a 3.5mm cable. Your only options for connecting them are wirelessly or via the provided USB cable. Both sound excellent to me.
Ultimately, I think the DSR9s at their best are simply too good to be dragged down by their limited usage possibilities. Stacking them up against any $549 headphones, I’m grabbing the DSR9s just because I feel the music when it flows through them. Movies are more immersive, voices are more realistic, and distortion is practically nonexistent. The DSR9s sound better than pricier alternatives like the Bowers & Wilkins P9, Audeze EL-8, Denon D7200, and AudioQuest NightHawks. In the world of wireless audio, their sound quality is without peer.
The Audio-Technica DSR9BTs might be the most unique headphones released this year. They’re certainly not the do-everything audio solution that competitors like V-Moda strive to be. But if you’re willing to accept their limitations and work around their peculiarities, I think you’ll find the DSR9s are also some of the best headphones released this year.
It's easy to confuse the Beats Studio (2013)headphones with the company's Studio Wireless over-the-ear headphones. That's because the two headphones look nearly identical, the big difference being the latter model includes not only active noise-cancelling but Bluetooth technology, which allows for wireless streaming from any Bluetooth-enabled device. Oh, and at $379.95 (AU$479), the Studio Wireless costs $80 more.
Both these headphones are based on a new "re-imagined" design of the original, uber-popular Studio, which didn't impress audiophiles and had other faults. These new models are lighter and built more sturdily. They also boast softer earcups and seem very comfortable (I know people who run in them), offering a snug fit and a fairly tight seal without feeling too tight.
I tested Studio Wireless for several weeks and came away really liking it. Soundwise, it measures up to many of the top Bluetooth headphones, and it's a big upgrade over the older on-ear Wireless in every way. The big question, of course, is it worth $379.95?
The answer really depends on whether you're OK with paying a premium for the Beats brand. But more on that in a minute.
The Studio Wireless comes in six colors -- white, blue, red, titanium, and black (matte or glossy) -- and is better constructed than the original Beats Studio . For what it's worth, I like the look of the the matte black and blue models best (I started with a glossy black review sample, which I later swapped for a matte black sample).
While these are premium headphones, they are made mostly of plastic, but their finishes help them seem a little more swanky than the original Studios. The glossy models do attract fingerprints, which is why the headphones come with a small cloth for buffing them (the buff cloth is now becoming a common accessory for this type of high-end plastic headphone).
Like the standard Studio (2013), this model has no "visible" screws, which is good, because those tiny little screws on the headband of the original had a habit of unscrewing themselves and falling out. However, when you break the headphones down -- they fold up (though not flat) to fit in a nice carrying case -- you'll notice Torx screws on the joints on each side of the headband. That joint does have some metal in it and snaps nicely into place when you unfold the headphones.
Beyond that carrying case, you get a few other extras, including both a straight cord for wired listening and one that integrates an Apple-friendly remote and microphone for cell-phone calls. (The remote features may not work with non-Apple devices, but the microphone will.)
Unfortunately, the cords come in red for all models, so there's a little bit of color clash when, say, you get the blue model and end up with a red cord. For $379.95, you should probably get cords that match the color of the headphones. Still, these are wireless headphones, and the vast majority of people will stow away those extra cords (except maybe the USB cable) and never use them, so color won't matter too much. However, it is worth noting that the headphone' internal battery has to have some charge for the headphones to work, wireless or wired.
On the inside, there's a new, "improved" DSP (digital signal processor) and software that Beats has, for marketing purposes, dubbed the Beats Acoustic Engine. These are active noise-canceling headphones, and they come equipped with two modes of "adaptive" noise cancellation. According to Beats, one mode is for music listening and offers "balanced" adaptive noise cancellation between your music and your environment, and the other mode offers stronger noise cancellation for when you're disconnected and just want to shut out the world (you can't play your music in this mode).
To power the Bluetooth and noise-cancellation circuitry, there's an integrated rechargeable lithium battery that you juice up via a Micro-USB connection (a cable is included -- again red). Battery life is rated at 12 hours of wireless listening and 20 hours of wired listening. A five-light LED "battery fuel gauge" under the power button on the right earcup indicates how much charge is left, and if you have an iOS device, a tiny battery gauge appears on your device next to the Bluetooth icon in the top right of your screen (as it does with all Bluetooth audio devices).
Like other stereo Bluetooth headphones, this model has a built-in microphone, and I thought the Beats Wireless worked very well as a wireless headset for making cell phone calls. Callers said they could hear me reasonably well, even when I was walking on the noisy streets of New York City on a fairly windy day.
The circular call answer/end button (with the Beats logo on it) is the middle of the left earcup and doubles as a one-button remote for music playback. Tap it once and it pauses your music. Tap it twice quickly and it advances to the next track. Three quick taps sends you back a track. Volume controls are also on the the same earcup, above and below the one-button remote.
Last but not least, there's an auto on/off feature for automatic shutdown once you unplug the headphones if you have them in corded mode. But beware of leaving them connected to your phone in Bluetooth mode and not turning them off. They will most likely run out of juice overnight.
Like 'em or hate 'em, Apple's AirPods have been the talk of the headphone world ever since they were announced alongside the iPhone 7 and 7 Plus back in September 2016. But there's another Apple wireless headphone from the company's Beats by Dre subsidiary that's also received its share of buzz: The BeatsX ($150, £130, AU$200). And like the AirPods, the BeatsX was also delayed, but it's officially available as of February 10.
The BeatsX employs Apple's new custom low-power Bluetooth chip, the W1, which is also found in the AirPods, PowerBeats3 Wireless and the Solo3 Wireless, and allows for automatic pairing with Apple devices updated with the latest versions of its operating systems (iOS 10, MacOS Sierra and WatchOS 3). But among that trio of new Beats models, the BeatsX is the only truly fresh model, and the first one designed with the help of Apple's design and engineering teams. (The PowerBeats3 Wireless and Solo3 Wireless just updated the previous models in their respective lines with Apple's new wireless chip.) Another bonus: the BeatsX is the only one that charges with a Lightning cable.
Ultimately, the BeatsX is a fresh take -- or really Apple's take -- on the neckband-style wireless headphone that LG made so popular with its Tone headsets and has been copied in recent years by an assortment of other companies. As in the past, Apple and Beats haven't reinvented the mousetrap so to speak, but they have built a better one.
The BeatsX's neckband -- Beats calls it a Flex-Form cable -- has two wires running through it that are made of nickel titanium alloy or nitinol, which was developed by the US Navy in the late 1950s and is very malleable, durable and lightweight. The key to it here is that it gives the band just enough rigidity and allows you to roll up the headphone so it fits it in an included compact carrying case. You can't do that with an LG Tone headset. (Side note: the soft-to-touch rubber carrying case is a bit of a dust magnet.)
It's also worth noting that the cable is anchored to your neck with two equally weighted bulges in the cord, one of which houses the battery and the other the headphone's electronics. This really isn't any different from what you find with other current neckband-style headphones, such as Skullcandy's affordable Ink'd Wireless, but the BeatsX's design is decidedly slicker and seemingly more durable.
Here's the bigger question: Are they actually good headphones? And are they worth buying versus other "true wireless" models, with separate left and right earpieces, let alone versus "regular" Bluetooth in-ear headphones, those quaint old-fashioned wireless models that connect the two earbuds with an actual cable?
The short answer is that these $159 Apple headphones (£159 in the UK and AU$229 in Australia) are better than you'd expect, especially for Apple product owners. But their unique design makes them somewhat limited and occasionally frustrating.
I tested the retail version of the AirPods, now that they're finally available after being announced alongside the iPhone 7 ($799.00 at Amazon Marketplace) and 7 Plus way back in September. That's how long my colleague Scott Stein has been living with preproduction versions of the headphones. Check out his first take, essentially an FAQ on the AirPods, and know that this review represents a consensus on our shared experience with the product.
What I (mostly) liked about the AirPods
There's a lot to like about the AirPods. Here's what I found to be good -- or great -- while wearing them.
Fit and comfort: The AirPods are super lightweight and stayed in my ears better than Apple's EarPods. Although the AirPods look similar to their wired siblings, they have some small design upgrades that are supposed to help create a better fit. The EarPods' cords are slim but still add weight to the buds, which can cause them to slip out if your ears aren't EarPod friendly (mine aren't). But with nothing dragging them down, the AirPods sat loosely nestled in my ears.
I also found them very easy to get in and out of my ears and very comfortable to wear, thanks to how light they are.
W1 chip makes for seamless pairing: Apple's custom Bluetooth chip, the W1, is designed to allow for automatic pairing with Apple devices running iOS 10, WatchOS 3 or MacOS Sierra. And it totally delivers: Just place the headphones near your compatible device and they'll automatically be detected and ask for pairing, no diving into settings menu needed. You can also transition easily between Apple devices, toggling between the sound of your computer to your iPhone or iPad's.
Yes, AirPods work with non-Apple Bluetooth audio devices (I paired them to a Samsung Galaxy S7 Edge), but you can't access their special features.
Flexibility and special features: The AirPods work very well as a stereo or mono headset -- if you want, you can use only one bud, left or right. According to Apple, they're equipped with a pair of "beam-forming microphones to focus on the sound of your voice." I made several calls and the people I spoke to were generally impressed with the call quality.
Thanks to dual optical sensors and accelerometers in each earpiece, the connected device (iPhone, iPad, Mac) knows when the AirPods are in your ears and will pause your music when one or both of them are removed. Depending on the music app you're listening to, they'll unpause your music when you put them back in your ears.
Not surprisingly, everything works flawlessly with Apple Music, but with Spotify, when I took both AirPods out of my ears, the music had to be restarted manually.
Reliable wireless: The wireless connection between the two earbuds is almost rock solid, with only the occasional hiccup. I've tried several "truly wireless" earphones and some of those early models were prone to dropouts. The AirPods' latest competitors, including Jabra's Sport Elite, Bragi The Headphone and Skybuds, offer reliable connectivity, but the AirPods are at the top of the class in this department.
Good sound quality: The sound has an open, airy quality to it because, well, these are open, non noise-isolating earbuds. That means the buds don't require a tight seal to get the best sound. You just plop them in your ears and you're good to go.
The AirPods sound good in a quiet environment. They're fairly well balanced and deliver a reasonable amount of bass. The upcoming BeatsX have more bass -- at least that was my impression from my short session with a preproduction unit -- but the AirPods had more than I thought they would.
Although the treble isn't great -- it's got a little bit of an edge to it -- compared to other totally wireless earphones, the AirPods' sound quality is above average. The Jabra Elite Sport ($249.99 at Amazon.com), which has a noise-isolating design and integrated hear-rate monitor, arguably sounds better but costs more.
The AirPods' sound is similar to that of the wired EarPods, so if you like those you should like the AirPods.
The charging case and battery life: The AirPods slide beautifully into a charging case that's the size of a container of Glide dental floss (and looks like one, too). The case and AirPods charge via an included Lightning cable. The case seals shut magnetically. It's pretty sweet.
The 5-hour battery life may not be fantastic, but thanks to the charging case, it's not a drawback. I rarely had the buds in my ears for more than a couple of hours, and when I took them out, I stowed them in the case, where they charged quickly. Apple says a 15-minute charge will give you 3 hours of battery life.
Discuss: Bose SoundLink Micro